TL;DR
This paper introduces a benchmark to evaluate RDF triplestores' compliance with the GeoSPARQL standard, aiming to improve support consistency and advance geospatial RDF data management.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive set of tests for GeoSPARQL compliance and compares current triplestore implementations to identify support gaps.
Findings
Support for GeoSPARQL varies significantly among triplestores.
Some systems achieve high compliance levels, while others lack full support.
The benchmark highlights areas for improvement in geospatial RDF data support.
Abstract
We propose a series of tests that check for the compliance of RDF triplestores with the GeoSPARQL standard. The purpose of the benchmark is to test how many of the requirements outlined in the standard a tested system supports and to push triplestores forward in achieving a full GeoSPARQL compliance. This topic is of concern because the support of GeoSPARQL varies greatly between different triplestore implementations, and such support is of great importance for the domain of geospatial RDF data. Additionally, we present a comprehensive comparison of triplestores, providing an insight into their current GeoSPARQL support.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
