Comment on "Migration of an electrophoretic particle in a weakly inertial or viscoelastic shear flow"
Akash Choudhary, T. Renganathan, and S. Pushpavanam

TL;DR
This paper clarifies discrepancies in the literature regarding electrophoretic particle migration in shear flows, correcting previous analytical expressions for viscoelastic and inertial effects, and aligning results across studies.
Contribution
It identifies and corrects errors in prior analytical models of particle migration, providing accurate expressions for viscoelastic and inertial flow effects.
Findings
Corrected viscoelastic migration velocity expression.
Reconciled inertial lift coefficient with previous studies.
Highlighted importance of including specific stress integrals.
Abstract
A recent article (Khair and Kabarowski; Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 033702) has studied the cross-streamline migration of electrophoretic particles in unbounded shear flows with weak inertia or viscoelasticity. That work compares their results with those reported in two of our previous studies (Choudhary et al.: J. Fluid Mech. 874; J. Fluid Mech. 898) and reports a disagreement in the derived analytical expressions. In this comment, we resolve this discrepancy. For viscoelastic flows, we show that Khair and Kabarowski have not accounted for a leading order surface integral of polymeric stress in their calculation of first-order viscoelastic lift. When this integral is included, the resulting migration velocity matches exactly with that reported in our work (J. Fluid Mech. 898). This qualitatively changes the migration direction that is reported by Khair and Kabarowski for viscoelastic flows.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
