Early-Universe-Physics Insensitive and Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards: Constraints on $\Omega_{\rm{m}}$ and Implications for the Hubble Tension
Weikang Lin, Xingang Chen, Katherine J. Mack

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to constrain the cosmic background evolution using early-universe-insensitive standards, providing robust measurements of matter density and implications for the Hubble tension.
Contribution
It demonstrates that certain cosmic measurements are insensitive to early-universe physics, enabling more robust constraints on cosmological parameters like m and H0.
Findings
Constraints on m consistent with Planck 2018
Reduced sensitivity of H0 to early-universe physics
Tension persists between post-recombination and local H0 measurements
Abstract
To further shed light on whether pre-recombination models can resolve the Hubble tension, we explore constraints on the cosmic background evolution that are insensitive to early-universe physics. The analysis of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy has been thought to highly rely on early-universe physics. However, we show that the fact that the sound horizon at recombination being close to that at the end of the drag epoch is insensitive to early-universe physics. This allows us to link the absolute sizes of the two horizons and treat them as free parameters. Jointly, the CMB peak angular size, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), and Type Ia supernovae can be used as "early-universe-physics insensitive and uncalibrated cosmic standards", which measure the cosmic history from recombination to today. They can set strong and robust constraints on the post-recombination cosmic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
