The impact of common envelope development criteria on the formation of LIGO/Virgo sources
Aleksandra Olejak, Krzysztof Belczynski, Natalia Ivanova

TL;DR
This study investigates how different criteria for common envelope development in binary star evolution influence the predicted populations of merging compact objects detectable by LIGO/Virgo, highlighting the importance of RLOF physics assumptions.
Contribution
The paper introduces modified criteria for common envelope development in population synthesis models, showing their significant impact on merger rates and properties of compact binary sources.
Findings
Restricted CE criteria can increase BH-BH merger rates via new formation channels.
Changes in RLOF assumptions alter mass and mass ratio distributions of merging binaries.
Uncertain RLOF physics critically affect predictions of LIGO/Virgo source populations.
Abstract
The treatment and criteria for development of unstable Roche lobe overflow (RLOF) that leads to the common envelope (CE) phase have hindered the evolutionary predictions for decades. In particular, the formation of black hole-black hole (BH-BH), black hole-neutron star (BH-NS), and neutron star-neutron star (NS-NS) merging binaries depends sensitively on the CE phase in classical isolated binary evolution model. All these mergers are now reported as LIGO/Virgo sources or source candidates. CE is even considered by some as a mandatory phase in the formation of BH-BH, BH-NS or NS-NS mergers in binary evolution. At the moment, there is no full first-principles model for development of CE. We employ the Startrack population synthesis code to test the current advancements in studies on stability of RLOF for massive donors to assess their effect on LIGO/Virgo source population. In particular,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
