TL;DR
This study investigates how different modeling choices in finite difference potential field solutions affect the global and local properties of the solar corona's magnetic field, emphasizing the influence of boundary conditions and resolution.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of how boundary conditions, data sources, and resolution impact potential field solutions in solar coronal modeling.
Findings
Open flux and morphology depend strongly on outer boundary conditions.
Large-scale structures are insensitive to model resolution.
Surface magnetic complexity varies with spatial scale.
Abstract
The potential field (PF) solution of the solar corona is a vital modeling tool for a wide range of applications, including minimum energy estimates, coronal magnetic field modeling, and empirical solar wind solutions. Given its popularity, it is important to understand how choices made in computing a PF may influence key properties of the solution. Here we study PF solutions for the global coronal magnetic field on 2012 June 13, computed with our high-performance finite difference code POT3D. Solutions are analyzed for their global properties and locally around NOAA AR 11504, using the net open flux, open field boundaries, total magnetic energy, and magnetic structure as metrics. We explore how PF solutions depend on 1) the data source, type, and processing of the inner boundary conditions, 2) the choice of the outer boundary condition height and type, and 3) the numerical resolution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
