Oscillator-to-oscillator codes do not have a threshold
Lisa H\"anggli, Robert Koenig

TL;DR
Oscillator-to-oscillator codes, which use non-Gaussian states to protect quantum information, do not exhibit a threshold for error correction when using practical encoding and decoding methods, limiting their error suppression capabilities.
Contribution
This paper proves that physically implementable oscillator-to-oscillator codes cannot have a threshold, establishing fundamental limits on their error correction performance.
Findings
No threshold exists for these codes with practical encoding and decoding.
A lower bound on logical error probability depends only on squeezing, not code size.
Oscillator-to-oscillator codes cannot convert below-threshold physical noise into arbitrarily low logical noise.
Abstract
It is known that continuous variable quantum information cannot be protected against naturally occurring noise using Gaussian states and operations only. Noh et al. (PRL 125:080503, 2020) proposed bosonic oscillator-to-oscillator codes relying on non-Gaussian resource states as an alternative, and showed that these encodings can lead to a reduction of the effective error strength at the logical level as measured by the variance of the classical displacement noise channel. An oscillator-to-oscillator code embeds K logical bosonic modes (in an arbitrary state) into N physical modes by means of a Gaussian N-mode unitary and N-K auxiliary one-mode Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill-states. Here we ask if - in analogy to qubit error-correcting codes - there are families of oscillator-to-oscillator codes with the following threshold property: They allow to convert physical displacement noise with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
