The future of forecasting competitions: Design attributes and principles
Spyros Makridakis, Chris Fry, Fotios Petropoulos, Evangelos, Spiliotis

TL;DR
This paper reviews the design principles of forecasting competitions, analyzing past examples, identifying gaps, and proposing a multi-contest approach to enhance forecasting accuracy and learning.
Contribution
It introduces ten key design attributes for forecasting competitions, maps existing competitions against these attributes, and suggests principles for future contest design, including a multi-contest 'athlon' concept.
Findings
Identified design gaps in past forecasting competitions
Proposed ten attributes for effective competition design
Recommended multi-contest approach to evaluate forecasters
Abstract
Forecasting competitions are the equivalent of laboratory experimentation widely used in physical and life sciences. They provide useful, objective information to improve the theory and practice of forecasting, advancing the field, expanding its usage and enhancing its value to decision and policymakers. We describe ten design attributes to be considered when organizing forecasting competitions, taking into account trade-offs between optimal choices and practical concerns like costs, as well as the time and effort required to participate in them. Consequently, we map all major past competitions in respect to their design attributes, identifying similarities and differences between them, as well as design gaps, and making suggestions about the principles to be included in future competitions, putting a particular emphasis on learning as much as possible from their implementation in order…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
