Contact Tracing Apps for COVID-19: Access Permission and User Adoption
Amal Awadalla Ali, Asma Hamid ElFadl, Maha Fawzy Abujazar, Sarah Aziz,, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Zubair Shah, Samir Brahim Belhaouari, Mowafa Househ, Tanvir, Alam

TL;DR
This study evaluates 53 COVID-19 contact tracing apps on the Google Play Store, highlighting issues with low ratings, privacy concerns due to dangerous permissions, and the inverse relationship between permission requests and user adoption.
Contribution
It provides the most extensive analysis of COVID-19 contact tracing apps, emphasizing privacy issues and user adoption factors related to permission requirements.
Findings
Nearly 40% of apps requested dangerous permissions.
Apps with more permissions had lower user adoption.
Most apps had low overall ratings.
Abstract
Contact tracing apps are powerful software tools that can help control the spread of COVID-19. In this article, we evaluated 53 COVID-19 contact tracing apps found on the Google Play Store in terms of their usage, rating, access permission, and user privacy. For each app included in the study, we identified the country of origin, number of downloads, and access permissions to further understand the attributes and ratings of the apps. Our results show that contact tracing apps had low overall ratings and nearly 40% of the included apps were requesting dangerous access permission including access to storage, media files, and camera permissions. We also found that user adoption rates were inversely correlated to access permission requirements. To the best of our knowledge, our article summarizes the most extensive collection of contact tracing apps for COVID-19. We recommend that future…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
