A Ranking Approach to Fair Classification
Jakob Schoeffer, Niklas Kuehl, Isabel Valera

TL;DR
This paper introduces a fair ranking-based decision system that leverages imperfect historical labels to improve fairness and accuracy in classification tasks, especially when true labels are unavailable.
Contribution
It proposes a novel distance-based ranking approach that incorporates historical decisions and mitigates bias, with theoretical guarantees of individual fairness.
Findings
Outperforms traditional classifiers in fairness and accuracy
Removes stereotypes from decision-making
Proven to be consistent with individual fairness principles
Abstract
Algorithmic decision systems are increasingly used in areas such as hiring, school admission, or loan approval. Typically, these systems rely on labeled data for training a classification model. However, in many scenarios, ground-truth labels are unavailable, and instead we have only access to imperfect labels as the result of (potentially biased) human-made decisions. Despite being imperfect, historical decisions often contain some useful information on the unobserved true labels. In this paper, we focus on scenarios where only imperfect labels are available and propose a new fair ranking-based decision system based on monotonic relationships between legitimate features and the outcome. Our approach is both intuitive and easy to implement, and thus particularly suitable for adoption in real-world settings. More in detail, we introduce a distance-based decision criterion, which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
