The Age of the Universe with Globular Clusters: Reducing Systematic Uncertainties
David Valcin, Raul Jimenez, Licia Verde, Jose Luis Bernal, Benjamin D., Wandelt

TL;DR
This paper reduces the systematic uncertainties in determining the age of globular clusters by better constraining the depth of the stellar convection envelope, leading to a more precise estimate of the universe's age consistent with cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the depth of the convection envelope can be accurately constrained using globular cluster data, significantly reducing age determination uncertainties.
Findings
Uncertainty in the convection envelope depth reduced from 0.5 to ~0.23-0.33 Gyr.
Globular cluster ages are now consistent with Planck cosmological estimates.
Methodology improves the precision of the universe's age estimate to about 13.5 Gyr.
Abstract
The dominant systematic uncertainty in the age determination of galactic globular clusters is the depth of the convection envelope of the stars. This parameter is partially degenerate with metallicity which is in turn degenerate with age. However, if the metal content, distance and extinction are known, the position and morphology of the red giant branch in a color-magnitude diagram are mostly sensitive to the value of the depth of the convective envelope. Therefore, using external, precise metallicity determinations this degeneracy and thus the systematic error in age, can be reduced. Alternatively, the morphology of the red giant branch of globular clusters color magnitude diagram can also be used to achieve the same. We demonstrate that globular cluster red giant branches are well fitted by values of the depth of the convection envelope consistent with those obtained for the Sun and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
