Ordinal and cardinal solution concepts for two-sided matching
Federico Echenique, Alfred Galichon

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unified cardinal framework for analyzing two-sided matching problems, comparing models with and without transfers, and introduces the concept of no-trade matchings to understand transfer effects.
Contribution
It provides a novel cardinal characterization of matching solutions and the concept of no-trade matchings to analyze transfer roles in matching models.
Findings
Cardinal solutions for transferable and nontransferable utility models are characterized.
The concept of no-trade matching clarifies when transfers impact outcomes.
Comparison between matching models with and without transfers is made transparent.
Abstract
We characterize solutions for two-sided matching, both in the transferable and in the nontransferable-utility frameworks, using a cardinal formulation. Our approach makes the comparison of the matching models with and without transfers particularly transparent. We introduce the concept of a no-trade matching to study the role of transfers in matching. A no-trade matching is one in which the availability of transfers do not affect the outcome.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
