Constraining alternatives to the Kerr black hole
Rajibul Shaikh, Kunal Pal, Kuntal Pal, Tapobrata Sarkar

TL;DR
This paper compares shadows of two alternative compact objects to Kerr black holes with the observed shadow of M87* to constrain their parameters, finding that certain parameter ranges are consistent with observations.
Contribution
It introduces and constrains two viable horizonless and non-Kerr rotating compact object models using EHT M87* shadow data.
Findings
Maximum parameter r_0 constrained between 2.54r_+ and 3.51r_+
Alternatives with r_0 below this range are consistent with M87* shadow size
Results support certain horizonless and non-Kerr models as plausible alternatives
Abstract
The recent observation of the shadow of the supermassive compact object M87 by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration has opened up a new window to probe the strong gravity regime. In this paper, we study shadows cast by two viable alternatives to the Kerr black hole, and compare them with the shadow of M87. The first alternative is a horizonless compact object (HCO) having radius and exterior Kerr geometry. The second one is a rotating generalisation of the recently obtained one parameter () static metric by Simpson and Visser. This latter metric, constructed by using the Newman-Janis algorithm, is a special case of a parametrised rotating non-Kerr geometry obtained by Johannsen. Here, we constrain the parameter of these alternatives using the results from M87 observation. We find that, for the mass, inclination angle and the angular diameter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
