Ground-state and decay properties of neutron-rich 106Nb
A. J. Mitchell, R. Orford, G. J. Lane, C. J. Lister, P. Copp, J. A., Clark, G. Savard, J. M. Allmond, A. D. Ayangeakaa, S. Bottoni, M. P., Carpenter, P. Chowdhury, D. A. Gorelov, R. V. F. Janssens, F. G. Kondev, U., Patel, D. Seweryniak, M. L. Smith, Y. Y. Zhong, S. Zhu

TL;DR
This study precisely measured the ground-state mass, decay half-life, and level scheme of neutron-rich 106Nb, providing new insights into its nuclear structure and decay properties, and challenging previous spin-parity assignments.
Contribution
The paper presents the most precise mass excess measurement of 106Nb and expands the decay scheme of 106Mo, also revising the ground-state spin-parity of 106Nb based on new decay data.
Findings
Mass excess of 106Nb measured as -66202.0(13) keV with improved precision.
Decay half-life of 106Nb found to be 1.097(21) seconds, slightly longer than previous values.
Expanded level scheme of 106Mo up to 4 MeV, suggesting a revision of 106Nb's ground-state spin-parity.
Abstract
The ground-state properties of neutron-rich 106Nb and its beta decay into 106Mo have been studied using the CARIBU radioactive-ion-beam facility at Argonne National Laboratory. Niobium-106 ions were extracted from a 252Cf fission source and mass separated before being delivered as low-energy beams to the Canadian Penning Trap, as well as the X-Array and SATURN beta-decay-spectroscopy station. The measured 106Nb ground-state mass excess of -66202.0(13) keV is consistent with a recent measurement but has three times better precision; this work also rules out the existence of a second long-lived, beta-decaying state in 106Nb above 5 keV in excitation energy. The decay half-life of 106Nb was measured to be 1.097(21) s, which is 8% longer than the adopted value. The level scheme of the decay progeny, 106Mo, has been expanded up to approximately 4 MeV. The distribution of decay strength and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
