Causal versions of Maximum Entropy and Principle of Insufficient Reason
Dominik Janzing

TL;DR
This paper introduces causal adaptations of the Principle of Insufficient Reason and Maximum Entropy, providing a justified framework for probability updates in cause-effect models and connecting to causal inference methods.
Contribution
It formalizes causal versions of PIR and MaxEnt by separating cause and mechanism constraints, and links these to causal inference techniques.
Findings
Causal PIR and MaxEnt are justified through mechanism and cause constraints.
Causal PIR relates to Information Geometric Causal Inference.
Discussion on extending causal MaxEnt to complex causal graphs.
Abstract
The Principle of Insufficient Reason (PIR) assigns equal probabilities to each alternative of a random experiment whenever there is no reason to prefer one over the other. The Maximum Entropy Principle (MaxEnt) generalizes PIR to the case where statistical information like expectations are given. It is known that both principles result in paradoxical probability updates for joint distributions of cause and effect. This is because constraints on the conditional P(effect|cause) result in changes of P(cause) that assign higher probability to those values of the cause that offer more options for the effect, suggesting "intentional behaviour". Earlier work therefore suggested sequentially maximizing (conditional) entropy according to the causal order, but without further justification apart from plausibility on toy examples. We justify causal modifications of PIR and MaxEnt by separating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
