The #ETH is False, #k-SAT is in Sub-Exponential Time
Giorgio Camerani

TL;DR
This paper presents a randomized algorithm for #k-SAT that counts solutions in sub-exponential time, challenging the widely held ETH and related hypotheses in computational complexity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel randomized algorithm for #k-SAT with sub-exponential runtime, refuting the #ETH and several other complexity hypotheses.
Findings
Existence of a #k-SAT counting algorithm in 2^{o(n)} time
Refutation of #ETH, ETH, #SETH, and related hypotheses
Implications for complexity theory and problem hardness
Abstract
We orchestrate a randomized algorithm for #-SAT which counts the exact number of satisfying assignments in time. The existence of such algorithm signifies that the #ETH is hereby refuted, and so are ETH, ETH, #SETH, SETH and SETH.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · semigroups and automata theory
