Why Do You Think It is a Black Hole?

TL;DR

This paper reviews the 2019 EHT experiment that captured the first image of a supermassive black hole, discussing the methods used to test the Kerr black hole hypothesis and its implications for Hawking radiation.

Contribution

It provides an in-depth analysis of the experimental methods used to verify the Kerr black hole hypothesis from the EHT data and discusses its significance for black hole physics.

Findings

Kerr black hole hypothesis is consistent with EHT data.

Methods used to test the hypothesis are complex and rigorous.

Implications for Hawking radiation are discussed.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the experiment presented in 2019 by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration that unveiled the first image of the supermassive black hole at the center of galaxy M87. The very first question asked by the EHT Collaboration was: What is the compact object at the center of galaxy M87? Does it have a horizon? Is it a Kerr black hole? In order to answer these questions, the EHT Collaboration first endorsed the working hypothesis that the central object is a black hole described by the Kerr metric, i.e. a spinning Kerr black hole as predicted by classical general relativity. They chose this hypothesis based on previous research and observations of the galaxy M87. After having adopted the Kerr black hole hypothesis, the EHT Collaboration proceeded to test it. They confronted this hypothesis with the data collected in the 2017 EHT experiment. They then compared the Kerr rotating black hole hypothesis with alternative explanations and finally found that their hypothesis was consistent with the data. In this paper, I describe the complex methods used to test the spinning Kerr black hole hypothesis. I conclude this paper with a discussion of the implications of the findings presented here with respect to Hawking radiation.