How good is Good-Turing for Markov samples?
Prafulla Chandra, Andrew Thangaraj, Nived Rajaraman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of the Good-Turing estimator for missing mass in Markov samples, revealing its dependence on spectral properties of transition matrices and establishing minimax rates for certain Markov chains.
Contribution
It extends the analysis of Good-Turing estimator to Markov samples, providing new theoretical bounds and demonstrating its practical relevance in language modeling.
Findings
Convergence depends on spectral properties of modified transition matrices.
Numerical evidence supports the relationship between eigenvalues and stationary probabilities.
Established minimax rates for missing mass estimation in rank-2 Markov chains.
Abstract
The Good-Turing (GT) estimator for the missing mass (i.e., total probability of missing symbols) in samples is the number of symbols that appeared exactly once divided by . For i.i.d. samples, the bias and squared-error risk of the GT estimator can be shown to fall as by bounding the expected error uniformly over all symbols. In this work, we study convergence of the GT estimator for missing stationary mass (i.e., total stationary probability of missing symbols) of Markov samples on an alphabet with stationary distribution and transition probability matrix (t.p.m.) . This is an important and interesting problem because GT is widely used in applications with temporal dependencies such as language models assigning probabilities to word sequences, which are modelled as Markov. We show that convergence of GT depends on convergence of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDNA and Biological Computing · Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Algorithms and Data Compression
