TL;DR
This paper introduces Causal Collaborative Filtering (CCF), a framework that incorporates causal inference into recommendation systems to improve accuracy and address Simpson's paradox, outperforming traditional methods.
Contribution
It provides a unified causal perspective of collaborative filtering, proposes a $do$-operation based intervention method, and introduces a counterfactual learning framework for better user preference estimation.
Findings
Improves recommendation accuracy on real-world datasets.
Reduces the impact of Simpson's paradox in CF algorithms.
Unifies traditional CF as special cases of causal models.
Abstract
Many of the traditional recommendation algorithms are designed based on the fundamental idea of mining or learning correlative patterns from data to estimate the user-item correlative preference. However, pure correlative learning may lead to Simpson's paradox in predictions, and thus results in sacrificed recommendation performance. Simpson's paradox is a well-known statistical phenomenon, which causes confusions in statistical conclusions and ignoring the paradox may result in inaccurate decisions. Fortunately, causal and counterfactual modeling can help us to think outside of the observational data for user modeling and personalization so as to tackle such issues. In this paper, we propose Causal Collaborative Filtering (CCF) -- a general framework for modeling causality in collaborative filtering and recommendation. We provide a unified causal view of CF and mathematically show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
