Optimizing accuracy and efficacy in data-driven materials discovery for the solar production of hydrogen
Yihuang Xiong, Quinn T. Campbell, Julian Fanghanel, Catherine K., Badding, Huaiyu Wang, Nicole E. Kirchner-Hall, Monica J. Theibault, Iurii, Timrov, Jared S. Mondschein, Kriti Seth, Rebecca Katz, Andres Molina, Villarino, Bet\"ul Pamuk, Megan E. Penrod, Mohammed M. Khan

TL;DR
This paper presents a combined computational and experimental approach to identify effective photocatalysts for solar hydrogen production, achieving a high validation rate and demonstrating the utility of a cost-effective density functional theory method.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic screening protocol integrating theory and experiment, significantly improving the discovery process of photocatalysts for water splitting.
Findings
Six compounds confirmed to generate hydrogen with favorable properties
The protocol reduced the candidate pool from over 70,000 to 11 synthesized materials
The Hubbard-corrected DFT method accurately predicts band gaps at lower computational cost
Abstract
The production of hydrogen fuels, via water splitting, is of practical relevance for meeting global energy needs and mitigating the environmental consequences of fossil-fuel-based transportation. Water photoelectrolysis has been proposed as a viable approach for generating hydrogen, provided that stable and inexpensive photocatalysts with conversion efficiencies over 10% can be discovered, synthesized at scale, and successfully deployed (Pinaud et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 1983). While a number of first-principles studies have focused on the data-driven discovery of photocatalysts, in the absence of systematic experimental validation, the success rate of these predictions may be limited. We address this problem by developing a screening procedure with co-validation between experiment and theory to expedite the synthesis, characterization, and testing of the computationally…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
