A Tight Bound for Stochastic Submodular Cover
Lisa Hellerstein, Devorah Kletenik, Srinivasan Parthasarathy

TL;DR
This paper proves a tight approximation bound for the Adaptive Greedy algorithm in Stochastic Submodular Cover, improving previous bounds and generalizing classical Set Cover results.
Contribution
It establishes a new tight bound of $( ext{ln}(Q/ ext{eta})+1)$ for the adaptive greedy algorithm, correcting earlier proofs and extending classical set cover bounds.
Findings
The bound $( ext{ln}(Q/ ext{eta})+1)$ is tight for the problem.
Previous bounds were quadratic or larger, now improved to a tight bound.
The result generalizes the classical set cover approximation bound.
Abstract
We show that the Adaptive Greedy algorithm of Golovin and Krause (2011) achieves an approximation bound of for Stochastic Submodular Cover: here is the "goal value" and is the smallest non-zero marginal increase in utility deliverable by an item. (For integer-valued utility functions, we show a bound of , where is the Harmonic number.) Although this bound was claimed by Golovin and Krause in the original version of their paper, the proof was later shown to be incorrect by Nan and Saligrama (2017). The subsequent corrected proof of Golovin and Krause (2017) gives a quadratic bound of . Other previous bounds for the problem are , implied by work of Im et al. (2016) on a related problem, and , due to Deshpande et al. (2016) and Hellerstein and Kletenik (2018), where is the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
