Applying the Tremaine-Weinberg Method to Nearby Galaxies: Stellar Mass-Based Pattern Speeds, and Comparisons with ISM Kinematics
Thomas G. Williams, Eva Schinnerer, Eric Emsellem, Sharon Meidt,, Miguel Querejeta, Francesco Belfiore, Ivana Be\v{s}li\'c, Frank Bigiel,, M\'elanie Chevance, Daniel A. Dale, Simon C. O. Glover, Kathryn Grasha, Ralf, S. Klessen, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Adam K. Leroy

TL;DR
This study applies the Tremaine-Weinberg method to 19 nearby galaxies using stellar mass data to measure pattern speeds, compares these with gas kinematics, and discusses implications for galaxy dynamics and bar properties.
Contribution
It demonstrates the reliability of stellar mass-based pattern speed measurements and highlights the limitations of using ISM kinematics for this purpose.
Findings
Stellar mass-based pattern speeds are reliable in about half of the sample.
ISM kinematics do not accurately reflect true pattern speeds, often showing a different angular frequency.
Galaxy properties like Hubble type and gas richness correlate with pattern speeds, but bar strength does not.
Abstract
We apply the Tremaine-Weinberg method to 19 nearby galaxies using stellar mass surface densities and velocities derived from the PHANGS-MUSE survey, to calculate (primarily bar) pattern speeds (). After quality checks, we find that around half (10) of these stellar mass-based measurements are reliable. For those galaxies, we find good agreement between our results and previously published pattern speeds, and use rotation curves to calculate major resonance locations (co-rotation radii and Lindblad resonances). We also compare these stellar-mass derived pattern speeds with H (from MUSE) and CO() emission from the PHANGS-ALMA survey. We find that in the case of these clumpy ISM tracers, this method erroneously gives a signal that is simply the angular frequency at a representative radius set by the distribution of these clumps (), and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
