TL;DR
This paper introduces an empirical framework to evaluate and compare external measures for assessing cluster analysis and community detection, aiding users in selecting appropriate measures based on their behavior under various transformations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, application-independent evaluation method that describes and compares external measures through regression analysis of their responses to parametric transformations.
Findings
Framework effectively characterizes measure behavior
Enables comparison of different evaluation measures
Assists in selecting suitable measures for specific applications
Abstract
In the context of cluster analysis and graph partitioning, many external evaluation measures have been proposed in the literature to compare two partitions of the same set. This makes the task of selecting the most appropriate measure for a given situation a challenge for the end user. However, this issue is overlooked in the literature. Researchers tend to follow tradition and use the standard measures of their field, although they often became standard only because previous researchers started consistently using them. In this work, we propose a new empirical evaluation framework to solve this issue, and help the end user selecting an appropriate measure for their application. For a collection of candidate measures, it first consists in describing their behavior by computing them for a generated dataset of partitions, obtained by applying a set of predefined parametric partition…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
