TL;DR
This study compares climate model simulations and paleoclimate reconstructions to understand the timescale-dependent variability of surface air temperature over the last 6000 years, revealing differences in local temperature persistence and model limitations.
Contribution
It introduces a spectral gain method to distinguish forced and internal variability and highlights discrepancies in local temperature variability between models and reconstructions.
Findings
Local temperature shows stronger persistence in reconstructions.
Global temperature variability is consistent across data sets.
Models underrepresent local temperature statistics over decades to centuries.
Abstract
Earth's climate can be understood as a dynamical system that changes due to external forcing and internal couplings. Essential climate variables, such as surface air temperature, describe this dynamics. Our current interglacial, the Holocene (11,700 yr ago to today), has been characterized by small variations in global mean temperature prior to anthropogenic warming. However, the mechanisms and spatiotemporal patterns of fluctuations around this mean, called temperature variability, are poorly understood despite their socio-economic relevance. Here, we examine discrepancies between temperature variability from model simulations and paleoclimate reconstructions by categorizing the scaling behavior of local and global surface air temperature on the timescale of years to centuries. To this end, we contrast power spectral densities (PSD) and their power-law scaling using simulated and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
