Fragile Complexity of Adaptive Algorithms

TL;DR

This paper investigates the fragile complexity of adaptive comparison-based algorithms, providing tight bounds for various fundamental problems like predecessor search, selection, and sorting, based on input structure.

Contribution

It introduces the concept of fragile complexity parameterized by input restrictions and establishes optimal bounds for several classic problems under these conditions.

Findings

Predecessor search has fragile complexity Θ(log k)

Selection of the k-th smallest element has expected fragile complexity O(log log k)

Deterministic sorting has fragile complexity Θ(log Inv)

Abstract

The fragile complexity of a comparison-based algorithm is $f(n)$ if each input element participates in $O(f(n))$ comparisons. In this paper, we explore the fragile complexity of algorithms adaptive to various restrictions on the input, i.e., algorithms with a fragile complexity parameterized by a quantity other than the input size n. We show that searching for the predecessor in a sorted array has fragile complexity ${\Theta}(\log k)$, where $k$ is the rank of the query element, both in a randomized and a deterministic setting. For predecessor searches, we also show how to optimally reduce the amortized fragile complexity of the elements in the array. We also prove the following results: Selecting the $k$-th smallest element has expected fragile complexity $O(\log \log k)$ for the element selected. Deterministically finding the minimum element has fragile complexity ${\Theta}(\log(Inv))$ and ${\Theta}(\log(Runs))$, where $Inv$ is the number of inversions in a sequence and $Runs$ is the number of increasing runs in a sequence. Deterministically finding the median has fragile complexity $O(\log(Runs) + \log \log n)$ and ${\Theta}(\log(Inv))$. Deterministic sorting has fragile complexity ${\Theta}(\log(Inv))$ but it has fragile complexity ${\Theta}(\log n)$ regardless of the number of runs.