A numerical study of observational systematic errors in lensing analysis of CMB polarization
Ryo Nagata, Toshiya Namikawa

TL;DR
This paper uses numerical simulations to study how observational systematic errors like gain, angle, and pointing inaccuracies affect CMB polarization lensing analysis, showing that expected error levels won't significantly impair delensing.
Contribution
It provides a detailed numerical assessment of systematic errors' impact on CMB lensing and delensing, highlighting their effects on $B$-modes and reconstruction accuracy.
Findings
Systematic errors influence $B$-mode amplitude and scale.
Expected near-future error levels do not significantly degrade delensing.
Lensing reconstruction remains robust against typical systematic errors.
Abstract
Impacts of observational systematic errors on the lensing analysis of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization are investigated by numerical simulations. We model errors of gain, angle, and pointing in observation of the CMB polarization and simulate polarization fields modulated by the errors. We discuss the response of systematics-induced -modes to amplitude and spatial scale of the imposed errors and show that the results of the lensing reconstruction and delensing analysis behave according to it. It is observed that error levels expected in the near future lead to no significant degradation in delensing efficiency.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
