Mapping stellar surfaces I: Degeneracies in the rotational light curve problem
Rodrigo Luger, Daniel Foreman-Mackey, Christina Hedges, and David W., Hogg

TL;DR
This paper investigates the inherent ambiguities in interpreting stellar rotational light curves to infer surface features, highlighting the limitations of single-band photometry and proposing ensemble analysis as a promising alternative.
Contribution
It explores degeneracies in light curve inversion, derives new insights on the influence of stellar inclination and limb darkening, and advocates for ensemble analyses over traditional priors.
Findings
Degeneracies significantly affect surface feature inference from light curves.
Single-band photometry cannot uniquely determine total spot coverage.
Ensemble analysis offers a data-driven alternative to prior-based methods.
Abstract
Thanks to missions like Kepler and TESS, we now have access to tens of thousands of high precision, fast cadence, and long baseline stellar photometric observations. In principle, these light curves encode a vast amount of information about stellar variability and, in particular, about the distribution of starspots and other features on their surfaces. Unfortunately, the problem of inferring stellar surface properties from a rotational light curve is famously ill-posed, as it often does not admit a unique solution. Inference about the number, size, contrast, and location of spots can therefore depend very strongly on the assumptions of the model, the regularization scheme, or the prior. The goal of this paper is twofold: (1) to explore the various degeneracies affecting the stellar light curve "inversion" problem and their effect on what can and cannot be learned from a stellar surface…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
