A search for radio pulsars in five nearby supernova remnants

TL;DR

This study conducted a sensitive radio pulsar search in five nearby supernova remnants using the Green Bank Telescope but found no new pulsars, highlighting the challenges in detecting pulsars in SNRs despite improved sensitivity.

Contribution

The paper presents a comprehensive, more sensitive radio survey of five SNRs covering their full extent, setting new flux density limits and discussing reasons for non-detections.

Findings

No new pulsars detected in the surveyed SNRs.

Survey sensitivity improved by a factor of 2 to 16 over previous efforts.

Re-detected a known pulsar, confirming survey effectiveness.

Abstract

Most neutron stars are expected to be born in supernovae, but only about half of supernova remnants (SNRs) are associated with a compact object. In many cases, a supernova progenitor may have resulted in a black hole. However, there are several possible reasons why true pulsar-SNR associations may have been missed in previous surveys: The pulsar's radio beam may not be oriented towards us; the pulsar may be too faint to be detectable; or there may be an offset in the pulsar position caused by a kick. Our goal is to find new pulsars in SNRs and explore their possible association with the remnant. The search and selection of the remnants presented in this paper was inspired by the non-detection of any X-ray bright compact objects in these remnants when previously studied. Five SNRs were searched for radio pulsars with the Green Bank Telescope at 820 MHz with multiple pointings to cover the full spatial extent of the remnants. A periodicity search plus an acceleration search up to 500 m/s^2 and a single pulse search were performed for each pointing in order to detect potential isolated binary pulsars and single pulses, respectively. No new pulsars were detected in the survey. However, we were able to re-detect a known pulsar, PSR J2047+5029, near SNR G89.0+4.7. We were unable to detect the radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsar PSR J2021+4026, but we do find a flux density limit of 0.08 mJy. Our flux density limits make our survey two to 16 times more sensitive than previous surveys, while also covering the whole spatial extent of the same remnants. We discuss potential explanations for the non-detection of a pulsar in the studied SNRs and conclude that sensitivity is still the most likely factor responsible for the lack of pulsars in some remnants.