Cumulants and Correlation Functions of Net-proton, Proton and Antiproton Multiplicity Distributions in Au+Au Collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
STAR Collaboration: M. S. Abdallah, J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams,, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, I. Aggarwal, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I., Alekseev, D. M. Anderson, A. Aparin, E. C. Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf, F. G., Atetalla, A. Attri, G. S. Averichev, V. Bairathi

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed measurement of cumulants and correlation functions of net-proton, proton, and antiproton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions across a range of energies, revealing non-monotonic behavior suggestive of critical phenomena in QCD.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic analysis of higher-order cumulants and correlation functions in heavy-ion collisions over a broad energy range, highlighting potential signals of the QCD critical point.
Findings
Non-monotonic energy dependence of net-proton C4/C2 with 3.1σ significance.
Negative two-particle correlation functions mainly due to baryon number conservation.
Four-particle correlation functions influence proton C4/C1 energy dependence below 19.6 GeV.
Abstract
We report a systematic measurement of cumulants, , for net-proton, proton and antiproton multiplicity distributions, and correlation functions, , for proton and antiproton multiplicity distributions up to the fourth order in Au+Au collisions at = 7.7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27, 39, 54.4, 62.4 and 200 GeV. The and are presented as a function of collision energy, centrality and kinematic acceptance in rapidity, , and transverse momentum, . The data were taken during the first phase of the Beam Energy Scan (BES) program (2010 -- 2017) at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) facility. The measurements are carried out at midrapidity ( 0.5) and transverse momentum 0.4 2.0 GeV/, using the STAR detector at RHIC. We observe a non-monotonic energy dependence ( = 7.7…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
