Spatially Resolved Star Formation and Inside-out Quenching in the TNG50 Simulation and 3D-HST Observations
Erica J. Nelson, Sandro Tacchella, Benedikt Diemer, Joel Leja, Lars, Hernquist, Katherine E. Whitaker, Rainer Weinberger, Annalisa Pillepich,, Dylan Nelson, Bryan A. Terrazas, Rebecca Nevin, Gabriel B. Brammer, Blakesley, Burkhart, Rachel Cochrane, Pieter van Dokkum

TL;DR
This study compares star formation in the TNG50 simulation and 3D-HST observations, finding good agreement in the star-forming main sequence and evidence for inside-out quenching driven by SMBH feedback in massive galaxies.
Contribution
It demonstrates that TNG50 accurately reproduces the observed star formation properties and quenching patterns, validating the SMBH feedback model for inside-out quenching.
Findings
TNG50 matches the observed star-forming main sequence in slope and normalization.
Both data sets show central SFR suppression in massive quenched galaxies.
Inside-out quenching in TNG50 is driven by SMBH feedback at low accretion rates.
Abstract
We compare the star forming main sequence (SFMS) -- both integrated and resolved on 1kpc scales -- between the high-resolution TNG50 simulation of IllustrisTNG and observations from the 3D-HST slitless spectroscopic survey at z~1. Contrasting integrated star formation rates (SFRs), we find that the slope and normalization of the star-forming main sequence in TNG50 are quantitatively consistent with values derived by fitting observations from 3D-HST with the Prospector Bayesian inference framework. The previous offsets of 0.2-1dex between observed and simulated main sequence normalizations are resolved when using the updated masses and SFRs from Prospector. The scatter is generically smaller in TNG50 than in 3D-HST for more massive galaxies with M_*>10^10Msun, even after accounting for observational uncertainties. When comparing resolved star formation, we also find good agreement…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
