Diffeomorphism classes of the doubling Calabi-Yau threefolds with Picard number two
Naoto Yotsutani

TL;DR
This paper classifies the diffeomorphism types of certain Calabi-Yau threefolds constructed via a gluing method from Fano threefolds, showing that different initial Fano pairs lead to non-diffeomorphic Calabi-Yau threefolds.
Contribution
It establishes that doubling Calabi-Yau threefolds with Picard number two are not diffeomorphic when derived from different Fano threefold families, using differential topology and the $$-invariant.
Findings
Doubling Calabi-Yau threefolds with Picard number two are non-diffeomorphic for different Fano pairs.
Classification relies on the $$-invariant and 6-manifold topology.
The method distinguishes Calabi-Yau threefolds based on initial Fano data.
Abstract
Previously we constructed Calabi-Yau threefolds by a differential-geometric gluing method using Fano threefolds with their smooth anticanonical divisors (New York J. Math. 20: 1-33, 2014). In this paper, we further consider the diffeomorphism classes of the resulting Calabi-Yau threefolds (which are called the doubling Calabi-Yau threefolds) starting from different pairs of Fano threefolds with Picard number one. Using the classifications of simply-connected -manifolds in differential topology and the -invariant introduced by Lee (J. Math. Pures Appl. 141: 195-219, 2020), we prove that any two of the doubling Calabi-Yau threefolds with Picard number two are not diffeomorphic to each other when the underlying Fano threefolds are distinct families.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Geometry and complex manifolds · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
