Eccentric binary black hole surrogate models for the gravitational waveform and remnant properties: comparable mass, nonspinning case
Tousif Islam, Vijay Varma, Jackie Lodman, Scott E. Field, Gaurav, Khanna, Mark A. Scheel, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Davide Gerosa, and Lawrence E., Kidder

TL;DR
This paper introduces the first eccentric binary black hole surrogate waveform and remnant models trained directly on numerical relativity simulations, enabling accurate predictions for eccentric mergers relevant to gravitational-wave detection.
Contribution
The paper presents novel surrogate models for eccentric binary black hole waveforms and remnant properties, trained on numerical relativity data without assuming circularization.
Findings
Waveform model achieves mismatches around 10^{-3}
Remnant model accurately predicts final mass and spin
Model extends reasonably to mass ratios up to 3 with low mismatches
Abstract
We develop new strategies to build numerical relativity surrogate models for eccentric binary black hole systems, which are expected to play an increasingly important role in current and future gravitational-wave detectors. We introduce a new surrogate waveform model, \texttt{NRSur2dq1Ecc}, using 47 nonspinning, equal-mass waveforms with eccentricities up to when measured at a reference time of before merger. This is the first waveform model that is directly trained on eccentric numerical relativity simulations and does not require that the binary circularizes before merger. The model includes the , , and spin-weighted spherical harmonic modes. We also build a final black hole model, \texttt{NRSur2dq1EccRemnant}, which models the mass, and spin of the remnant black hole. We show that our waveform model can accurately predict numerical relativity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
