Where have all the solar-like stars gone? Rotation period detectability at various inclinations and metallicities
Timo Reinhold, Alexander I. Shapiro, Veronika Witzke, Nina-E. N\`emec,, Emre I\c{s}{\i}k, Sami K. Solanki

TL;DR
This study investigates why many solar-like stars with near-solar rotation periods lack detected periods, attributing it to activity types, inclination, metallicity, and noise, and suggests new methods to improve detection.
Contribution
The paper models light curves of G-type stars to analyze how activity, inclination, and noise affect rotation period detectability, explaining the underrepresentation of solar-like stars.
Findings
Detectability depends on activity type and surface irregularity.
Photometric noise significantly hampers period detection.
Most solar-like stars with known periods likely have undetected rotation periods.
Abstract
The plethora of photometric data collected by the Kepler space telescope has promoted the detection of tens of thousands of stellar rotation periods. However, these periods are not found to an equal extent among different spectral types. Interestingly, early G-type stars with near-solar rotation periods are strongly underrepresented among those stars with known rotation periods. In this study we investigate whether the small number of such stars can be explained by difficulties in the period determination from photometric time series. For that purpose, we generate model light curves of early G-type stars with solar rotation periods for different inclination angles, metallicities and (magnitude-dependent) noise levels. We find that the detectability is determined by the predominant type of activity (i.e. spot or faculae domination) on the surface, which defines the degree of irregularity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
