Sending or not sending twin-field quantum key distribution with distinguishable decoy states
Yi-Fei Lu, Mu-Sheng Jiang, Yang Wang, Xiao-Xu Zhang, Fan Liu, Chun, Zhou, Hong-Wei Li, Wan-Su Bao

TL;DR
This paper reveals a side channel vulnerability in twin-field quantum key distribution with distinguishable decoy states, proposing an attack that can compromise security without detection, highlighting the need for improved practical security measures.
Contribution
It introduces a passive frequency shift attack exploiting distinguishable decoy states in TF-QKD, demonstrating potential security breaches and providing analysis for secure key rate bounds.
Findings
Eve can obtain full secret key information at long distances.
The attack exploits frequency domain distinguishability of decoy states.
Practical security at the source is crucial for TF-QKD implementations.
Abstract
Twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) and its variants can overcome the fundamental rate-distance limit of QKD which has been demonstrated in the laboratory and field while their physical implementations with side channels remains to be further researched. We find the external modulation of different intensity states through the test, required in those TF-QKD with post-phase compensation, shows a side channel in frequency domain. Based on this, we propose a complete and undetected eavesdropping attack, named passive frequency shift attack, on sending or not-sending (SNS) TF-QKD protocol given any difference between signal and decoy states in frequency domain which can be extended to other imperfections with distinguishable decoy states. We analyze this attack by giving the formula of upper bound of real secure key rate and comparing it with lower bound of secret key rate under…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
