A Model of Densifying Collaboration Networks
Keith A. Burghardt, Allon G. Percus, Kristina Lerman

TL;DR
This paper presents a model explaining how research collaboration networks grow and densify, capturing empirical patterns like superlinear scaling, Heaps' law, and Zipf's law through mechanisms such as preferential attachment and local collaboration.
Contribution
It introduces a novel model with three mechanisms that accurately reproduces empirical scaling laws and heterogeneity in research collaboration networks.
Findings
Model aligns with two-century co-authorship data
Reveals emergent heterogeneous scaling laws
Explains superlinear growth and densification patterns
Abstract
Research collaborations provide the foundation for scientific advances, but we have only recently begun to understand how they form and grow on a global scale. Here we analyze a model of the growth of research collaboration networks to explain the empirical observations that the number of collaborations scales superlinearly with institution size, though at different rates (heterogeneous densification), the number of institutions grows as a power of the number of researchers (Heaps' law) and institution sizes approximate Zipf's law. This model has three mechanisms: (i) researchers are preferentially hired by large institutions, (ii) new institutions trigger more potential institutions, and (iii) researchers collaborate with friends-of-friends. We show agreement between these assumptions and empirical data, through analysis of co-authorship networks spanning two centuries. We then develop…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Business Strategy and Innovation
