The collapse of a quantum state as a joint probability construction
Peter Morgan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a mathematical framework for quantum state collapse as a joint probability construction, using a non-commutative, non-associative product, offering an alternative to the traditional collapse interpretation.
Contribution
It formalizes the collapse process as a nonlinear, non-commutative product and presents a no-collapse model using L"uders transformers for joint measurements.
Findings
Collapse as a joint probability construction
Equivalent no-collapse model with L"uders transformers
Simplified analysis for large measurement sequences
Abstract
The collapse of a quantum state can be understood as a mathematical way to construct a joint probability density even for operators that do not commute. We can formalize that construction as a non-commutative, non-associative collapse product that is nonlinear in its left operand as a model for joint measurements at timelike separation, in part inspired by the sequential product for positive semi-definite operators. The familiar collapse picture, in which a quantum state collapses after each measurement as a way to construct a joint probability density for consecutive measurements, is equivalent to a no-collapse picture in which L\"uders transformers applied to subsequent measurements construct a Quantum-Mechanics--Free-Subsystem of Quantum Non-Demolition operators, not as a dynamical process but as an alternative mathematical model for the same consecutive measurements. The no-collapse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
