On metrics robust to noise and deformations
William Leeb

TL;DR
This paper investigates a family of integral probability metrics for comparing functions, demonstrating their robustness to noise and deformations, and providing error bounds for finite sample approximations, with practical experiments included.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes the robustness properties of a class of metrics for signals, including error bounds and empirical validation, extending their applicability to noisy and deformed data.
Findings
Metrics are robust to broad classes of deformations.
Finite sample approximations are robust to Gaussian noise.
Numerical experiments compare these metrics with Wasserstein distances.
Abstract
We study the properties of a family of distances between functions of a single variable. These distances are examples of integral probability metrics, and have been used previously for comparing probability measures on the line; special cases include the Earth Mover's Distance and the Kolmogorov Metric. We examine their properties for general signals, proving that they are robust to a broad class of deformations. We also establish corresponding robustness results for the induced sliced distances between multivariate functions. Finally, we establish error bounds for approximating the univariate metrics from finite samples, and prove that these approximations are robust to additive Gaussian noise. The results are illustrated in numerical experiments, which include comparisons with Wasserstein distances.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical and numerical algorithms · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Statistical Methods and Inference
