Spread and defend infection in graphs
Arya Tanmay Gupta

TL;DR
This paper introduces a probabilistic model combining infection spread, firefighting, upgrading, and repairing on a dynamic, temporal graph class, enabling the study of complex infection containment strategies.
Contribution
It presents a novel probabilistic framework for concurrent infection spread and defense mechanisms on a generalized temporal graph model, including node addition and removal.
Findings
Concurrent burning and firefighting processes modeled probabilistically.
Graph class allows simulation of complex, dynamic networks with node turnover.
Framework enables analysis of infection containment strategies in complex systems.
Abstract
The spread of an infection, a contagion, meme, emotion, message and various other spreadable objects have been discussed in several works. Burning and firefighting have been discussed in particular on static graphs. Graph burning simulates the notion of the spread of "fire" throughout a graph (plus, one unburned node burned at each time-step); graph firefighting simulates the defending of nodes by placing firefighters on the nodes which have not been already burned while the fire is being spread (started by only a single fire source). This article studies a combination of firefighting and burning on a graph class which is a variation (generalization) of temporal graphs. Nodes can be infected from "outside" a network. We present a notion of both upgrading (of unburned nodes, similar to firefighting) and repairing (of infected nodes). The nodes which are burned, firefighted, or repaired…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
