Impact of Explanation on Trust of a Novel Mobile Robot
Stephanie Rosenthal, Elizabeth J. Carter

TL;DR
This study investigates how explanations of robot behavior influence supervisor trust, finding that explanations initially increase trust and neglect tolerance, but this effect diminishes over time, with trust levels converging regardless of explanations.
Contribution
The paper provides empirical evidence that explanations can temporarily enhance trust and neglect tolerance in novel robot environments, measured through dual-task experiments.
Findings
Explanations increase initial neglect tolerance.
Trust levels equalize after multiple trials.
Survey responses do not capture subtle trust changes.
Abstract
One challenge with introducing robots into novel environments is misalignment between supervisor expectations and reality, which can greatly affect a user's trust and continued use of the robot. We performed an experiment to test whether the presence of an explanation of expected robot behavior affected a supervisor's trust in an autonomous robot. We measured trust both subjectively through surveys and objectively through a dual-task experiment design to capture supervisors' neglect tolerance (i.e., their willingness to perform their own task while the robot is acting autonomously). Our objective results show that explanations can help counteract the novelty effect of seeing a new robot perform in an unknown environment. Participants who received an explanation of the robot's behavior were more likely to focus on their own task at the risk of neglecting their robot supervision task…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
