Reply to Comment on "Strong Quantum Darwinism and Strong Independence are Equivalent to Spectrum Broadcast Structure"
Thao P. Le, Alexandra Olaya-Castro

TL;DR
This paper clarifies a correction to a previous work on quantum Darwinism, emphasizing that the core proofs remain valid despite a mathematical oversight in defining 'strong independence' for Spectrum Broadcast Structure.
Contribution
The authors correct a mathematical expression related to 'strong independence' while confirming that their original qualitative definitions and proofs remain valid.
Findings
Mathematical expression of 'strong independence' was corrected.
Original qualitative definitions and proofs are unaffected.
The core results about Spectrum Broadcast Structure remain valid.
Abstract
In a recent comment [Feller et. al, arXiv:2101.09186] on our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010403 (2019)], Feller et. al identified a mistake in our mathematical expression of "strong independence" for states that satisfy Spectrum Broadcast Structure. We concede that we wrote a mathematical condition that is necessary but not sufficient. However, we used the original and correct qualitative definition for "strong independence" throughout the paper and in our proofs, therefore the proofs and statements, aside from the aforementioned mathematical expression, remain correct.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
