Probability distributions for analog-to-target distances
Paul Platzer, Pascal Yiou (ESTIMR), Philippe Naveau (ESTIMR),, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Filipot, Maxime Thiebaut, Pierre Tandeo (IMT Atlantique -, SC)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the probability distributions of the best analog-to-target distances in chaotic systems, revealing how system dimensionality influences the number of analogs needed for accurate predictions, with applications in atmospheric data analysis.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical and numerical analysis of the distributions of the K-best analog-to-target distances, incorporating system dimensionality effects and practical applications.
Findings
Dimensionality affects the size of the catalog needed for good analogs.
The means and variances of K-best analog distances depend on system properties.
Numerical simulations confirm theoretical predictions with real atmospheric data.
Abstract
Some properties of chaotic dynamical systems can be probed through features of recurrences, also called analogs. In practice, analogs are nearest neighbours of the state of a system, taken from a large database called the catalog. Analogs have been used in many atmospheric applications including forecasts, downscaling, predictability estimation, and attribution of extreme events. The distances of the analogs to the target state condition the performances of analog applications. These distances can be viewed as random variables, and their probability distributions can be related to the catalog size and properties of the system at stake. A few studies have focused on the first moments of return time statistics for the best analog, fixing an objective of maximum distance from this analog to the target state. However, for practical use and to reduce estimation variance, applications usually…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
