Contrasting Mechanisms for Photodissociation of Methyl Halides Adsorbed on Thin Films of C$_6$H$_6$ and C$_6$F$_6$
E. T. Jensen

TL;DR
This study compares photodissociation mechanisms of methyl halides on C6H6 and C6F6 thin films, revealing different pathways and energy transfer processes influenced by the film's electronic properties.
Contribution
It identifies distinct photodissociation pathways on different aromatic films and proposes a charge-transfer mechanism for energy transfer in C6H6.
Findings
C6H6 allows both neutral and DEA pathways for CH3Cl and CH3Br.
C6F6 suppresses DEA pathway due to electronic quenching.
Additional dissociation pathways occur for CH3I on C6H6 via energy transfer.
Abstract
The mechanisms for photodissociation of methyl halides (CHX, X= Cl, Br, I) have been studied for these molecules when adsorbed on thin films of CH or CF on copper single crystals, using time-of-flight spectroscopy with 248nm and 193nm light. For CHCl and CHBr monolayers adsorbed on CH, two photodissociation pathways can be identified: neutral photodissociation similar to the gas-phase, and a dissociative electron attachment (DEA) pathway due to photoelectrons from the metal. The same methyl halides adsorbed on a CF thin film display only neutral photodissociation, with the DEA pathway entirely absent due to intermolecular quenching via a LUMO-derived electronic band in the CF thin film. For CHI adsorbed on a CF thin film, illumination with 248nm light results in CH photofragments departing due to neutral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
