TL;DR
This paper introduces the market potential method to evaluate and compare the value of diverse energy storage technologies in electricity systems, emphasizing the importance of value over mere cost reduction for system optimization.
Contribution
It presents a novel market potential valuation method for multiple energy storage technologies and demonstrates its application in a European power system model.
Findings
High-cost hydrogen storage can be more valuable than low-cost variants.
Modifying storage sizing and interactions can reduce system costs by 10%.
Focusing on technology value enhances system cost-effectiveness.
Abstract
An energy storage technology is valuable if it makes energy systems cheaper. Traditional ways to improve storage technologies are to reduce their costs; however, the cheapest energy storage is not always the most valuable in energy systems. Modern techno-economical evaluation methods try to address the cost and value situation but do not judge the competitiveness of multiple technologies simultaneously. This paper introduces the market potential method as a new complementary valuation method guiding innovation of multiple energy storage. The market potential method derives the value of technologies by examining common deployment signals from energy system model outputs in a structured way. We apply and compare this method to cost evaluation approaches in a renewables-based European power system model, covering diverse energy storage technologies. We find that characteristics of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
