Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systems
Joshua A. Kroll

TL;DR
This paper explores the principle of traceability in computing systems, emphasizing its role in operationalizing accountability by linking system creation, behavior, and governance goals to enhance transparency and understanding.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes global AI principles to define traceability requirements and maps existing tools to these needs, identifying gaps for improving accountability mechanisms.
Findings
Traceability connects system construction and behavior to governance goals.
Existing tools partially meet traceability requirements, with notable gaps.
Reframes accountability discussions through the lens of traceability.
Abstract
Accountability is widely understood as a goal for well governed computer systems, and is a sought-after value in many governance contexts. But how can it be achieved? Recent work on standards for governable artificial intelligence systems offers a related principle: traceability. Traceability requires establishing not only how a system worked but how it was created and for what purpose, in a way that explains why a system has particular dynamics or behaviors. It connects records of how the system was constructed and what the system did mechanically to the broader goals of governance, in a way that highlights human understanding of that mechanical operation and the decision processes underlying it. We examine the various ways in which the principle of traceability has been articulated in AI principles and other policy documents from around the world, distill from these a set of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
