Structured versus Decorated Cospans
John C. Baez, Kenny Courser, Christina Vasilakopoulou

TL;DR
This paper compares structured and decorated cospans in applied category theory, showing conditions under which they are equivalent and illustrating their use in modeling various open systems like circuits and epidemiological models.
Contribution
It establishes an isomorphism between structured and decorated cospans via Grothendieck categories, extending the framework for modeling open systems.
Findings
Structured and decorated cospans can be made equivalent under certain conditions.
The paper generalizes Fong's decorated cospan construction to symmetric lax monoidal functors.
Applications include modeling electrical circuits, Petri nets, and epidemiological systems.
Abstract
One goal of applied category theory is to understand open systems. We compare two ways of describing open systems as cospans equipped with extra data. First, given a functor , a "structured cospan" is a diagram in of the form . If and have finite colimits and preserves them, it is known that there is a symmetric monoidal double category whose objects are those of and whose horizontal 1-cells are structured cospans. Second, given a pseudofunctor , a "decorated cospan" is a diagram in of the form together with an object of . Generalizing the work of Fong, we show that if has finite colimits and is symmetric lax…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
