Numerical simulation of Delft-jet-in-hot-coflow (DJHC) flames using the Eddy Dissipation Concept model for turbulence-chemistry interaction

TL;DR

This study evaluates the Eddy Dissipation Concept model's effectiveness in simulating turbulent natural gas flames in a Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow burner, comparing predictions with experimental data across different conditions.

Contribution

It provides a detailed assessment of the EDC model's performance in MILD combustion conditions, highlighting its strengths and limitations in predicting ignition and temperature profiles.

Findings

Realizable k-e model better predicts entrainment.

EDC model predicts early ignition and temperature peaks.

Predictions of lift-off height decrease with Reynolds number.

Abstract

In this paper we report results of a numerical investigation of turbulent natural gas combustion for jet in a coflow of lean combustion products in the Delft-Jet-in-Hot-Coflow (DJHC) burner which emulates MILD (Moderate and Intense Low Oxygen Dilution) combustion behavior. The focus is on assessing the performance of the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) model in combination with two-equation turbulence models and chemical kinetic schemes for about 20 species (Correa mechanism and DRM19 mechanism) by comparing predictions with experimental measurements. We study two different flame conditions corresponding to two different oxygen levels (7.6% and 10.9% by mass) in the hot coflow, and for two jet Reynolds number (Re=4100 and Re=8800). The mean velocity and turbulent kinetic energy predicted by different turbulence models are in good agreement with data without exhibiting large differences among the model predictions. The realizable k-e model exhibits better performance in the prediction of entrainment. The EDC combustion model predicts too early ignition leading to a peak in the radial mean temperature profile at too low axial distance. However the model correctly predicts the experimentally observed decreasing trend of lift-off height with jet Reynolds number. A detailed analysis of the mean reaction rate of the EDC model is made and as possible cause for the deviations between model predictions and experiments a low turbulent Reynolds number effect is identified. Using modified EDC model constants prediction of too early ignition can be avoided. The results are weakly sensitive to the sub-model for laminar viscosity and laminar diffusion fluxes.