Clutter distributions for tomographic image standardization in ground-penetrating radar
Brian M. Worthmann, David H. Chambers, David S. Perlmutter, Jeffrey E., Mast, David W. Paglieroni, Christian T. Pechard, Garrett A. Stevenson, and, Steven W. Bond

TL;DR
This paper models ground-penetrating radar clutter intensities using Weibull distributions, enabling improved image standardization and better understanding of GPR penetration and array illumination.
Contribution
It introduces Weibull distribution fitting for GPR clutter, providing new metrics for array illumination, soil attenuation, and depth estimation, enhancing image analysis and threat detection.
Findings
Weibull distribution fits clutter better than Gaussian or lognormal.
Spatial Weibull parameters reveal array illumination and soil attenuation.
Clutter distribution modeling aids in standardizing images for threat detection.
Abstract
Multistatic ground-penetrating radar (GPR) signals can be imaged tomographically to produce three-dimensional distributions of image intensities. In the absence of objects of interest, these intensities can be considered to be estimates of clutter. These clutter intensities spatially vary over several orders of magnitude, and vary across different arrays, which makes direct comparison of these raw intensities difficult. However, by gathering statistics on these intensities and their spatial variation, a variety of metrics can be determined. In this study, the clutter distribution is found to fit better to a two-parameter Weibull distribution than Gaussian or lognormal distributions. Based upon the spatial variation of the two Weibull parameters, scale and shape, more information may be gleaned from these data. How well the GPR array is illuminating various parts of the ground, in depth…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
