Sub-damped Lyman alpha systems in the XQ-100 survey II -- Chemical evolution at 2.4<z<4.3
Trystyn A.M. Berg, Michele Fumagalli, Valentina D'Odorico, Sara L., Ellison, Sebastian Lopez, George D. Becker, Lise Christensen, Guido Cupani,, Kelly D. Denney, Ruben Sanchez-Ramirez, Gabor Worseck

TL;DR
This study analyzes 155 sub-damped Lyman alpha systems at redshifts 2.4 to 4.3 to understand their role in cosmic chemical evolution, revealing they are generally more metal-poor than DLAs when ionization effects are considered.
Contribution
First comprehensive metallicity analysis of subDLAs over 2.4<z<4.3 using ionization corrections with MCMC and Cloudy models, highlighting their chemical evolution and relation to DLAs.
Findings
SubDLAs are more metal-poor than DLAs after ionization correction.
Gas-phase [Si/Fe] in subDLAs is similar to DLAs, indicating comparable dust depletion.
[C/O] remains solar across metallicities, suggesting carbon-rich ejecta in circumgalactic environments.
Abstract
We present the measured gas-phase metal column densities in 155 sub-damped Lyman alpha systems (subDLAs) with the aim to investigate the contribution of subDLAs to the chemical evolution of the Universe. The sample was identified within the absorber-blind XQ-100 quasar spectroscopic survey over the redshift range 2.4<=z<=4.3. Using all available column densities of the ionic species investigated (mainly CIV, SiII, MgII, SiIV, AlII, FeII, CII, and OI; in order of decreasing detection frequency), we estimate the ionization-corrected gas-phase metallicity of each system using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques to explore a large grid of Cloudy ionization models. Without accounting for ionization and dust depletion effects, we find that the HI-weighted gas-phase metallicity evolution of subDLAs are consistent with damped Lyman alpha systems (DLAs). When ionization corrections are included,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
