The Issues of Mismodelling Gravitational-Wave Data for Parameter Estimation
O Edy, A. Lundgren, L. K. Nuttall

TL;DR
This paper investigates how non-stationary noise in gravitational wave data affects Bayesian parameter estimation, revealing that non-stationarity can significantly bias error estimates, especially for longer signals, impacting astrophysical measurements.
Contribution
The authors develop a formalism to quantify the impact of non-stationary noise on gravitational wave parameter estimation and demonstrate its significance for signals lasting tens of seconds or more.
Findings
Non-stationarity can cause errors to be under- or overestimated.
Short-duration signals are less affected by non-stationarity.
Longer signals experience significantly increased errors due to non-stationary noise.
Abstract
Bayesian inference is used to extract unknown parameters from gravitational wave signals. Detector noise is typically modelled as stationary, although data from the LIGO and Virgo detectors is not stationary. We demonstrate that the posterior of estimated waveform parameters is no longer valid under the assumption of stationarity. We show that while the posterior is unbiased, the errors will be under- or overestimated compared to the true posterior. A formalism was developed to measure the effect of the mismodelling, and found the effect of any form of non-stationarity has an effect on the results, but are not significant in certain circumstances. We demonstrate the effect of short-duration Gaussian noise bursts and persistent oscillatory modulation of the noise on binary-black-hole-like signals. In the case of short signals, non-stationarity in the data does not have a large effect on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
