Dissonance Between Human and Machine Understanding
Zijian Zhang, Jaspreet Singh, Ujwal Gadiraju, Avishek Anand

TL;DR
This study investigates the differences between human and machine understanding in image classification, revealing how well models align with human reasoning and the impact of task difficulty on feature selection.
Contribution
It provides a large-scale crowdsourcing analysis quantifying the dissonance between human and machine understanding in complex models.
Findings
Certain well-performing models align closely with human feature use.
Task difficulty influences the similarity between human and machine feature selection.
Humans generally outperform machines in selecting features for accurate image recognition.
Abstract
Complex machine learning models are deployed in several critical domains including healthcare and autonomous vehicles nowadays, albeit as functional black boxes. Consequently, there has been a recent surge in interpreting decisions of such complex models in order to explain their actions to humans. Models that correspond to human interpretation of a task are more desirable in certain contexts and can help attribute liability, build trust, expose biases and in turn build better models. It is, therefore, crucial to understand how and which models conform to human understanding of tasks. In this paper, we present a large-scale crowdsourcing study that reveals and quantifies the dissonance between human and machine understanding, through the lens of an image classification task. In particular, we seek to answer the following questions: Which (well-performing) complex ML models are closer to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFeature Selection
