QUBIC IV: Performance of TES Bolometers and Readout Electronics
M. Piat, G. Stankowiak, E.S. Battistelli, P. de Bernardis, G. D, Alessandro, M. De Petris, L. Grandsire, J.-Ch. Hamilton, T.D. Hoang, S., Marnieros, S. Masi, A. Mennella, L. Mousset, C. O Sullivan, D. Prele, A., Tartari, J.-P. Thermeau, S.A. Torchinsky, F. Voisin, M. Zannoni

TL;DR
This paper reports on the laboratory testing and characterization of the QUBIC IV prototype, focusing on TES bolometers and readout electronics performance for cosmological observations.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed performance evaluation of the TES bolometer array and readout system in the QUBIC IV prototype, including noise and operational parameters.
Findings
80% of detectors within operational parameters
Thermal decoupling compatible with phonon noise of 5×10^-17 W/Hz^0.5
Instrument noise equivalent power of 2×10^-16 W/Hz^0.5
Abstract
A prototype version of the Q & U bolometric interferometer for cosmology (QUBIC) underwent a campaign of testing in the laboratory at Astroparticle Physics and Cosmology laboratory in Paris (APC). The detection chain is currently made of 256 NbSi transition edge sensors (TES) cooled to 320 mK. The readout system is a 128:1 time domain multiplexing scheme based on 128 SQUIDs cooled at 1 K that are controlled and amplified by an SiGe application specific integrated circuit at 40 K. We report the performance of this readout chain and the characterization of the TES. The readout system has been functionally tested and characterized in the lab and in QUBIC. The low noise amplifier demonstrated a white noise level of 0.3 nV.Hz^-0.5. Characterizations of the QUBIC detectors and readout electronics includes the measurement of I-V curves, time constant and the noise equivalent power. The QUBIC…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
